For certification consultants and the companies running ISO 9001, 14001 and 27001

Rebuilding evidence
for every certification audit?

Fitting a policy to your own organisation takes a long time, and once it is set there is no record that you kept it. PAASUP ACE helps author the tailored policy and turns everyday work into the evidence.

This is the same system PAASUP runs its own quality, environmental and security operations on.

Setting the policy and keeping it
sit on one system.

The policy belongs to the company. A consultant supports the work, and in practice often drafts it. Either way, fitting the policy to your own organisation is what takes the longest.

Traditionally

You receive reference cases and templates, then the company spends man-months redefining them for its own situation. If the standard is revised meanwhile, you start again.

PAASUP ACE

Hold industry, size and scope as a profile and a tailored policy set is generated from the base master. When the profile or the standard changes, only the affected clauses are rebuilt.

Once set, the policy documents usually sit in the consultant's files while the actual records sit in the company's business systems. That is why every audit starts by reconciling the two.

Certification consultant

Policy work for every client in one place

  • Hold each client's industry, size and scope as a profile and support tailored policy authoring from a base master.
  • When a client profile changes, regenerate only the clauses it affects.
  • Roll a standard revision or a master change out across every client you handle.
  • Compare compliance status across clients on the same basis.

Client

Operate to the policy you set, and evidence accumulates

  • Approvals, document revisions, training and meetings run as usual, and the records attach to standard clauses.
  • See continuously which clauses are satisfied and where the gaps are.
  • Audit preparation turns from gathering material into showing what is already there.
  • When a policy is revised, the operating baseline and the check items update with it.

PAASUP ACE replaces neither the consultant's judgement nor the company's operation. It puts both on the same data, cutting the time spent tailoring and the reconciliation at every audit.

The problem isn't a lack of documents —
it's that documents live apart from the work.

01

Evidence collection starts right before the audit

Scrambling to gather meeting minutes, training records and review history at the last minute means you can't even prove the work actually happened. What wasn't recorded didn't happen, as far as the auditor is concerned.

02

Everything depends on one person

When only one person knows where the documents are and which version is current, the system stalls the year that person is out. Certification has to live in the system, not in a person.

03

Documents that stop the moment the audit ends

Documents made only for certification sit apart from real work, so nobody opens them again. The next audit starts the same collection work from zero.

We don't create evidence.
The work becomes the evidence.

Leave approvals, document revisions, training completion and management review meetings are work you'd do regardless of certification. When those records stay linked to the relevant clause of the standard, preparing for an audit stops being a scramble to collect material - it becomes showing what's already there.

How everyday work accumulates into audit evidence Records from e-approvals, document management, training management and management review meetings accumulate in the system as audit evidence: document revision history, training and competency records, internal audit and management review records, and access-permission and view logs. Everyday work E-approvals —leave, travel, requests Document mgmt —revisions, reviews Training —completion, competency Meetings —management review, audits Records linked to clauses Audit evidence Document revision history Training & competency records Internal audit & review records Access & view logs
There's no separate "evidence screen." It's the same data, viewed from another angle.

Setting the policy and seeing whether
it is kept are not separate.

Usually the tool that writes the policy and the work of checking it are two different things, so you find out what is missing right before the audit. PAASUP ACE makes an approved clause the monitored item itself, so gaps surface day to day.

  1. 01

    Author

    Generate a tailored policy set from the base master using an industry, size and scope profile.

  2. 02

    Approve

    The moment it is approved, each clause also gets what counts as satisfying it and a review cadence. You do not enter monitoring items separately.

  3. 03

    Operate

    Approval, document revision, training and meeting records attach to the clause as its evidence. Nothing is produced just for the audit.

  4. 04

    Monitor

    Each clause is judged continuously as satisfied, gapped or overdue. A clause with no evidence is not counted as satisfied, and gaps and upcoming reviews are surfaced first.

When the policy changes, the loop runs again. The monitoring definition for a revised clause updates, and that clause is re-judged against the new basis. Audit preparation becomes showing this screen as it is.

Quality, environmental and security don't need three separate tools.

Procedures the three standards require in common - training, documentation, internal audit, management review, nonconformity action — run once. Only what differs by standard is managed separately.

ISO 9001

Quality

  • 6.1Risk & opportunity register
  • 6.2Quality objectives
  • 7.2Competency & training
  • 7.5Documented information
  • 8.4Supplier evaluation
  • 9.2Internal audit
  • 9.3Management review
  • 10.2Nonconformity & corrective action (CAPA)
ISO 14001

Environmental

  • 6.1.3Compliance obligations register
  • 6.2Environmental objectives
  • 7.2Competency & training
  • 7.5Documented information
  • 8.2Emergency preparedness & drills
  • 9.2Internal audit
  • 9.3Management review
  • 10.2Nonconformity & corrective action (CAPA)
ISO 27001

Information Security

  • 6.1.2Risk assessment — asset × threat matrix
  • 6.1.3Risk treatment plan & SoA
  • 7.2Security awareness & training
  • A.5.18Access grant/revocation history
  • A.6.5Employment status change history
  • A.8.15Login & audit logs
  • A.8.16Document view/download logs
  • 9.2Internal audit
  • 9.3Management review
  • 10.1Nonconformity & corrective action (CAPA)

The system doesn't replace every requirement of the standards. Procedures that require judgment outside the system - context-of-the-organization and stakeholder analysis, or environmental aspect/impact assessment, for example — still need to be carried out separately. Talk to us and we'll map out which procedures move into the system and which stay outside it.

"Did that actually happen?"
Answered on screen.

Access grant/revocation history

Every document, register and feature permission keeps both when it was granted and when it was revoked. You can answer, with a record, exactly when a departed employee's access was cut off.

Document view/download logs

Who opened or downloaded which document, and when, is recorded. Access control is proven by an actual log, not just a written policy.

Git-based document history

Document management runs on a self-hosted git repository as the source of truth. Revision history lives in commits - who changed what, and when, can't be edited away after the fact.

Employment status change history

Hires, departures and personnel changes stay on record, forming the basis for access revocation and training-scope decisions.

We don't start with a company-wide rollout.

  1. 1

    Register your org chart and staff

    Setting up departments and reporting lines defines approval routing, training scope and permission scope together. Sign in with your Google Workspace account.

  2. 2

    Connect your document repository

    Upload the documents you already use into the repository. From then on, every revision keeps a history.

  3. 3

    Turn on registers, standard by standard

    Start with the registers (risk, compliance, training, audits, management review) for the standard you're preparing for. Add the rest when you need them.

Questions we get during evaluation

Answers that depend on your size and target standards are confirmed in writing after you get in touch.

Do you obtain the certification for us?
No. Certification bodies run the audit. We provide the system that makes the required records accumulate from everyday work. We can refer you to consultants separately.
Does the system alone satisfy every requirement?
No. Procedures that must be judged outside a system, such as context and interested-party analysis or environmental aspect evaluation, remain yours. We map what moves into the system and what does not.
Do we have to prepare all three standards?
Start with the registers for the standard you are preparing and add the rest when you need them. Procedures the three standards share are operated once.
Can we bring the documents we already use?
Upload them and later revisions are tracked. Document management uses a self-hosted git repository as the source of truth, so who changed what and when stays in the commit history.
Can we show when a leaver's access was revoked?
Document, register and feature permissions all record both grant and revocation time. Read together with employment-status history, revocation is evidenced by record.
Do we have to move the whole company at once?
No. Register the org chart and employee records first, which sets approval lines, training targets and permission scope, then connect documents and turn on registers in turn.
We are a consultancy. Can we run this per client?
Each client is registered with its own profile covering industry, size and scope. Policy documents are generated from a base master and tailored to that client, and when the profile or the master changes only the affected clauses are regenerated. Client data stays separated.
Can a new consultant take over an existing client?
Policy documents and registers live in the same system, so the criteria and the history survive a change of consultant. Which clause is satisfied by which record is held in the system, so handover is a transfer of access rather than a transfer of files.

We'll map out what you can use as-is
from your current setup, and reply.

Tell us your organization's size, which standard you're preparing for, and where your documents currently live - we'll review the scope and order of rollout and get back to you.

  • Standard(s) you're preparing for (9001, 14001, 27001) and expected audit timing
  • How you currently manage documents and records
  • Team size and the account environment you use